Legal Opinion
Kamakahi v. American Society for Reproductive Medicine
District Court, N.D. California
Decided February 3, 2015No. Case No. 11-cv-01781-JCSPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER REGARDING MOTIONS TO EXCLUDE EXPERT OPINIONS AND MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION
Re: Dkt. Nos. 133, 165, 141
JOSEPH C. SPERO, United States Chief Magistrate Judge
I. INTRODUCTION
This is a putative class action brought on behalf of women who donated eggs (some*170times referred to as oocytes) through fertility climes and donation agencies that agreed to comply with ethical guidelines set by Defendants American Society for Reproductive Medicine (“ASRM”) and Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology (“SART”). Plaintiffs Lindsay Kamakahi and Justine Levy allege that Defendants’ guidelines…
2Cases cited57 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Des Roches v. California Physicians' ServiceDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2017
- Senne v. Kansas City Royals Baseball Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2016
- Apple Inc. v. Superior Court of San Diego Cnty., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Wit v. United Behavioral HealthDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2016
- Ambrosia v. Cogent Communications, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2016
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.