Ambrosia v. Cogent Communications, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING MOTION CONDITIONALLY TO CERTIFY COLLECTIVE ACTION, TO CERTIFY CLASS ACTION, AND GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS CERTAIN INDIVIDUAL PLAINTIFFS
RICHARD SEEBORG, United States District Judge
I. INTRODUCTION
In this putative class and collective action, Plaintiff Joan Ambrosio,1 alongside a host of other salaried employees of defendant Cogent Communications, Inc. (“Cogent”), seeks damages and other relief based on Cogent’s alleged failure to pay overtime in violation of California and federal law. The putative class consists of all current and former California-based account managers who…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Comcast Corp. v. BehrendSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Amgen Inc. v. Connecticut Retirement Plans and Trust FundsSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Hanlon v. Chrysler Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Avery v. TEKsystems, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2024
- Richter v. CC-Palo Alto, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2021
- Shoults v. G4S Secure Solutions (USA) IncorporatedDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2020