Lydon v. Dean
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Ward, Justice,
The principal issues involved on this appeal regard instructions given and refused by the court. Specifically we are concerned with the difference in the effect of an instruction containing the clause “a proximate cause” and one containing the clause “the proximate cause. ’ ’
FACTS. It will be necessary to set out only sufficient facts to clarify the issues here involved. About 7:00 P.M., Sunday, June 17, 1951, one John F. Lydon, was driving an automobile in a westerly direction along highway 70, going from Benton to Hot Springs. In the car with him were the appellants, Aline…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Oviatt, Administrator v. GarretsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
- Berrafato v. ExnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
- Sedorchuk v. WeederMichigan Supreme Court · 1945
- Willbanks v. LasterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947
- Checker Cab Baggage Co., Inc. v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1935
3Cited by7 opinions
- Woodward v. BlytheSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1971
- Garroutte v. General Motors Corp.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1959
- Purnell v. Missouri Pacific Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1962
- Gantt v. SissellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1954
- Superior Forwarding Co. v. GarnerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1963
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.