Legal Opinion

Purnell v. Missouri Pacific Ry. Co.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 17, 1962No. 5-2861PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Neill Bohlinger, Associate Justice.

The appellant brought this action alleging that as an employee of the appellee railroad he was injured in the course of his employment through the negligence of appellee and sought damages under the Federal Employer’s Liability Act [commonly referred to as FELA].

The trial resulted in a verdict for the appellee and the appellant prosecutes this appeal, presenting an abbreviated record and relying upon the following points:

“Appellee’s Instruction No. 3 was prejudicially erroneous in (1) instructing in terms of common-law proximate causation instead of the much…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Jesionowski v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Herdman v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Lydon v. DeanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1953

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Weatherford v. WommackSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
  2. Myers v. Ark. State Highway Comm.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API