Legal Opinion · Dissent

Superior Forwarding Co. v. Garner

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 25, 1963No. 5-2869Published

1DissentJim Johnson, Associate Justice

I do not agree with the majority view. In addition to the rule requiring that appelant Johnny Hunt’s testimony be considered as disputed and controverted, there is a stronger rule applicable to this case which is set out in Penny v. Gulf Refining Co., 217 Ark. 805, 233 S. W. 2d 372, as follows:

“A directed verdict for the defendant is proper only when there is no substantial evidence from which the jurors as reasonable men could possibly find the issues for the plaintiff. In such circumstances, the trial judge must give to the plaintiff’s evidence its highest probative value, taking into…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Oviatt, Administrator v. GarretsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
  2. Biddle v. JacobsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1914
  3. Lydon v. DeanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1953
  4. Penny v. Gule Refining Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API