Legal Opinion

Blandina v. Midland Funding, LLC

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided December 23, 2014No. Civil Action No. 13-1179PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

NITZAI. QUIÑONES ALEJANDRO, District Judge.

INTRODUCTION

Before this Court is a motion for class certification filed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (Rule) 23 by Violet P. Blandina (“Plaintiff’), [ECF 36], the opposition filed by Defendants Midland Funding, LLC (“MF”) and Midland Credit Management Inc. (“MCM”) (collectively “Defendants”), [ECF 39], and Plaintiffs reply. [ECF 46]. The motion has been fully briefed and for the reasons stated herein, the motion for class certification is granted. BACKGROUND

The largely undisputed relevant facts of Plaintiffs claims are…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  3. Amgen Inc. v. Connecticut Retirement Plans and Trust FundsSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  4. In Re: The Prudential Insurance Company Of America Sales Practices LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
  5. In Re Hydrogen Peroxide Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Abraham v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2017
  2. Good v. Nationwide Credit, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
  3. BARENBAUM v. HAYT, HAYT & LANDAU, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API