Legal Opinion
BARENBAUM v. HAYT, HAYT & LANDAU, LLC
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided September 10, 2019No. 2:18-cv-04120Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA DANIEL BARENBAUM, on behalf of : himself and all others similarly situated, : CIVIL ACTION Plaintiff, : : v. : : HAYT, HAYT & LANDAU, LLC, : No. 18-4120 Defendant. : MEMORANDUM Schiller, J. September 10, 2019 Lawyers and laymen alike know that a “deposition” is not the same as just any conversation. A deposition is recorded testimony given under oath. There are thus consequences for failing to appear at a properly noticed deposition; in fact, one can be held in contempt of court for ignoring a notice of deposition.…
2Cases cited57 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- County of Los Angeles v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.