Snodgrass v. Snodgrass
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.
This is the second appeal. 212 Ala. 74, 101 So. 837. Upon reversal the parties by amendment and agreement reshaped the pleading or the effect thereof, and in some respects extended, and added to, the maps exhibited, incorporated in the evidence a later survey, and the description of the Snodgrass deed of 1871 is changed from “170” to “17.” The testimony was retaken and more fully developed.
The decree is in error requiring reformation of a deed as to any tract of land not specifically within the pleadings and litigated isshes of fact. We have been unable to find that the S'. E. Vi of the S'.…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Hodge v. JoySupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
- Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway v. CrosbySupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
- Ivy v. HoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918
- Betts v. WardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
- Patterson v. WeaverSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Frazer v. First Nat. Bank of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
- Leslie v. ClickSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
- Griffith v. First Nat. Bank of GuntersvilleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
- Federal Land Bank v. Southmont Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1929
- Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. EstesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.