Legal Opinion

Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. Estes

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 19, 1938No. 6 Div. 244PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

Phases of this matter are reported as Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. Estes, 228 Ala. 582, 155 So. 79; Estes v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 232 Ala. 656, 169 So. 316.

In the last appeal, it waá held, among other things, that in a bill by mortgagee’s transferee, seeking to have an equitable mortgage declared, signatures to which were not acknowledged, the mortgagor was entitled to $2000.00 exemption out of proceeds of sale of homestead, as against the contention that mortgagor was first required'to pay, or offer to pay, indebtedness due transferee, as a condition precedent to the…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway v. CrosbySupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  2. Carter v. MitchellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  3. de Graffenried v. BreitlingSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  4. McCall v. McCurdySupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
  5. Worthington v. WorthingtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ex Parte BiddleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952
  2. Willingham v. StarnesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API