Legal Opinion

United States v. Lazarenko

District Court, N.D. California

Decided March 10, 2009No. C 00-00284 CRBPublished

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER RE: MOTION TO DISMISS

CHARLES R. BREYER, District Judge.

Petitioner Universal Trading & Investment Co. (“UTICo”) initiated these ancillary proceedings to assert its claims to the forfeited funds of Pavel Lazarenko, claiming (1) its interest in the funds vested prior to any criminal activity, thus its interest is superior to that of the Government; and (2) it was a bona fide purchaser for value without knowledge that the funds were subject to forfeiture. Before the Court is the Government’s Motion to Dismiss this action for want of standing and Motion for Summary Judgment. Petitioner UTICo…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. Renee Hooper Michelle Ralph, Dana M. Hooper Paul William RalphCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  2. United States v. Real Property Located at 5208 Los Franciscos WayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  3. United States v. TimleyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
  4. United States v. William J. McCorkleCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
  5. United States v. Speed Joyeros, S.A.District Court, E.D. New York · 2006

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API