Legal Opinion

United States v. Speed Joyeros, S.A.

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided January 27, 2006No. 05-CV-570(JBW)PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM, ORDER & JUDGMENT

WEINSTEIN, Senior District Judge.

The United States moves to strike the claims of petitioners to assets in the Republic of Panama forfeited pursuant to a plea agreement between defendants and the United States. The motion to strike is granted.

I. Facts

Yardena Hebroni and Eliahu Mizrahi, along with their Panamanian jewelry companies Speed Joyeros, S.A. and Argento Vivo, S.A. were indicted in this district on September 15, 2000 on money laundering and conspiracy charges. In response to this indictment, Panamanian officials closed the corporate defendants three days…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. Hilda Amiel, Kathryn Amiel, Joanne Amiel, and Sarina AmielCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
  2. United States v. Richard J. Lester, and Sheila Lester, Petitioner-Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  3. Mercado v. U.S. Customs ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
  4. United States v. BCCI Holdings (Luxembourg), S.A.District Court, District of Columbia · 1997
  5. United States v. Speed Joyeros, S.A.District Court, E.D. New York · 2002

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. United States v. SaltiCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
  2. United States v. GinnDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2010
  3. United States v. BurgeDistrict Court, C.D. Illinois · 2011
  4. United States v. George Marcus HallCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
  5. United States v. Ceballos-LepeDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2013

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API