Legal Opinion
United States v. Timley
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided November 15, 2007No. 07-1627PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BEAM, Circuit Judge.
This case comes before us a second time. It involves the forfeiture of $130,097 under 21 U.S.C. § 853. Specifically at issue is whether the district court 1 erred in either denying Michael Timley’s lawyer, Patrick W. Peters, an ancillary hearing, or ordering the $130,097 forfeited to the United States. We affirm in all respects.
I. BACKGROUND
We recounted the underlying facts in great detail in our prior opinion, United States v. Timley, 443 F.3d 615 (8th Cir.2006) (“Timley /”), and decline to do so again. Briefly, as the facts relate to the disposition of this appeal, the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Caplin & Drysdale, Chartered v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. Three Hundred Sixty Four Thousand Nine Hundred Sixty Dollars ($364,960.00) in United States CurrencyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- United States v. One Lincoln Navigator 1998, Freddie Bearden Wanda Breedlove Andrews, Claimants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. One-Sixth Share of Bulger in All Present & Future Proceeds of Mass Millions Lottery Ticket No. M246233Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Gowan v. Patriot Group, LLC (In Re Dreier LLP)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- United States v. ParrettCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Charles EmorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015
- United States v. SaltiCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. WattsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.