United States v. William J. McCorkle
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
TJOFLAT, Circuit Judge:
I
After finding William and Chantal McCorkle guilty of laundering the proceeds of a fraudulent telemarketing scheme, 1 the jury returned a special verdict forfeiting to the United States the McCorkles’ interests in various assets. Among these assets were $2 million that had been placed in trust by the McCorkles in the Cayman Islands for the payment of their lawyers’ fees and transferred by the trust to F. Lee Bailey, William McCorkle’s attorney. 2 At the January 25, 1999 sentencing, the district court, as a part of the McCorkles’ sentencing package, entered an order of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- International Union, United Mine Workers v. BagwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Caplin & Drysdale, Chartered v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Montana v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Tefel v. RenoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
- United States v. VenskeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
3Cited by25 opinions
- Gwynn v. Walker (In Re Walker)Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
- Karl Savoury v. U.S. Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
- United States v. BaileyDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2003
- United States v. F. Lee BaileyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
- McCorkle v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2005
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.