Legal Opinion

C. R. Anthony Co. v. Williams

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 19, 1939No. 28516PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDanner, J.

The plaintiff in error, defendant below, appeals from a judgment for $4,000 based on a jury verdict in favor of the defendant in error in an action for damages for the death of her husband. Herein the parties will be referred to as plaintiff and defendant.

A summary of the allegations in plaintiff’s petition is succinctly stated in defendant’s brief, as follows:

“It was alleged that the plaintiff was the widow of one Dan Williams, a resident of Texas, the defendant a resident of Oklahoma, and had its place of business on the east side of Main street in the city of Elk City, the building facing…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Palmer v. Boston Penny Savings BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  2. DeGraf v. Anglo California National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Clinkscales v. MundkoskiSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  4. St. Louis-S. F. R. Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  5. De Verdi v. WeissCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Henryetta Construction Co. v. HarrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
  2. Byford v. Town of AsherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
  3. Foster v. HardingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
  4. McKinney v. HarringtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
  5. Atchison, T. & S. F. R. Co. v. KennardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API