Legal Opinion

De Verdi v. Weiss

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 8, 1936No. Civ. 11032PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWood, J.

Plaintiffs commenced this action to recover compensation for personal injuries suffered by Mrs. De Verdi on June 18, 1935, when she slipped and fell in the Weiss Cafe operated by defendant Harry Weiss. When both parties had rested, the court upon motion of defendant instructed the jury to return a verdict for defendant. Plaintiffs appeal from the judgment entered upon the return of the verdict.

In passing upon the power of the trial court to grant a motion for an instructed verdict we must consider the evidence in the light most favorable to plaintiffs. The action of the trial court will be…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Williamson v. HardyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  2. Newson v. HawleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Brinkworth v. Sam Seelig Co.California Court of Appeal · 1921
  4. McClurken v. Ralph's Grocery Co.California Court of Appeal · 1933

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Nicola v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1942
  2. Vaughn v. Montgomery Ward & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1950
  3. Napier v. First Congregational Church of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Jones v. HotchkissCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  5. C. R. Anthony Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API