Legal Opinion

Pryor v. Briggs Manufacturing Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 8, 1945No. Docket No. 60, Calendar No. 42,821PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButzel, J.

Tbe parties in,the. instant case entered into a stipulation of facts and waived a jury trial. No testimony therefore was taken. The facts that are pertinent on appeal are as follows.. On July 28, 1943, plaintiff was employed by defendant as an instructor in its technical training school at the rate of $263 per month, payable semimonthly. Such employment was not stated to be for any definite period of time. Plaintiff performed his duties as instructor until September 1, 1943, when he'was transferred with no change in salary to the service department where he remained until October 30, 1943,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Maynard v. Royal Worcester Corset Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
  2. Chamberlain v. Detroit Stove WorksMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Tirrill v. MillerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
  4. O'Connor v. Hayes Body Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Loew v. Hayes Manufacturing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1922

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. Boyd Henson Campbell, United States of America v. Joseph Lonnie JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1972
  2. United States v. Alex Harding, A/K/A Mark HardingCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1974
  3. Karr v. Board of Trustees of Michigan State UniversityMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. McPherson v. ErvinMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Virginia Werth v. United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of ColoradoBankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API