Legal Opinion
Pine Valley Meats, Inc. v. Canal Capital Corp.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided July 15, 1997No. C5-96-2051PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NORTON, Judge.
Appellant challenges the trial court’s denial of judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial and alleges various errors at trial. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.
FACTS
Respondent Pine Valley Meats, Inc. (Pine Valley) brought this action against appellant Canal Capital Corporation (Canal) and respondent Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of South St. Paul (the HRA) for damages resulting from Canal’s destruction of a cattle walkway connecting Pine Valley’s meat packing plant and the South St. Paul stockyards.
In 1936, the St. Paul Union…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Fabio v. BellomoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
- Frost-Benco Electric Ass'n v. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Stuempges v. Parke, Davis & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Wild v. RarigSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Duxbury v. Spex Feeds, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
- Myers v. Hearth Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
- Deli v. University of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
- Hern v. Bankers Life Casualty Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2001
- Canal Capital Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. Valley Pride Pack, Inc., Also Known as Pine Valley Ii, Inc., a Wisconsin CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.