Legal Opinion
In Re Grand Jury Witness Subpoenas
District Court, S.D. Florida
Decided January 25, 1974No. GJ 15PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ATKINS, District Judge.
This cause has come before the Court on motions by Fernando Prio, Hugo Ola-zabal, Candido Pacheco and Oscar Alfonzo, witnesses subpoenaed before the United States Grand Jury, to compel the production of transcripts of their prior and future grand jury testimony. Additionally, the witnesses Olazabal, Pacheco and Alfonzo request the production of their transcribed statements which were given to law enforcement agents on various occasions. These motions have been raised against the following background.
The petitioners were subpoenaed to testify on January…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. Procter & Gamble Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Gelbard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. Maurice RoseCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954
- Brown v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- In Re Application of Lance EisenbergCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- United States v. Ariel Henry TagerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
- In Re Richard L. Bast v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1976
- United States v. KilpatrickDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1984
- In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated January 15, 1986. Appeal of United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.