Legal Opinion
United States v. Ariel Henry Tager
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided October 20, 1980No. 79-1691PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SETH, Chief Judge.
This appeal arises from the conviction of appellant for mail fraud. 18 U.S.C. § 1341. The government alleged a scheme involving many people, including doctors, lawyers, and automobile repairmen, who were engaged in defrauding insurance companies. Appellant, an attorney, was indicted and prior to trial he moved to dismiss the indictment and to suppress certain evidence. The motions were denied, and it is from the denial of these motions that Mr. Tager appeals.
The relevant facts are as follows. The investigation leading to the indictment herein at issue was started by a Mr.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. Procter & Gamble Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Douglas Oil Co. of Cal. v. Petrol Stops NorthwestSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. Maurice RoseCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954
- United States v. Bobbie Stanford, Louis Watson, Janice Davis, Estella Patterson, Doris Beverly, Dorothy Fife, Richard O'rourke, and Dorothy JonesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978
- United States v. Interstate Dress Carriers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Fund for Constitutional Government v. National Archives and Records ServiceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
- United States v. PimentalCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
- Joseph Jaskolski and National Insurance Crime Bureau v. Rick DanielsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
- United States v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
- United States v. David ScottCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.