Legal Opinion
In Re Richard L. Bast v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided August 4, 1976No. 75-2140PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WIDENER, Circuit Judge:
This case presents the question of whether Richard L. Bast, a witness before a federal grand jury, should be furnished with a copy of his testimony. The district court declined to grant his request, and we affirm.
Bast, on or about February 3, 1975, testified before a federal grand jury in Alexandria. He had been subpoenaed to appear, but his appearance was occasioned by his voluntarily going to the United States Attorney and advising that he had information about the matter under investigation, as well as apparently because of additional information Bast had furnished…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United States v. Procter & Gamble Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- United States v. Maurice RoseCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954
- United States v. Joseph A. Chase, United States of America v. Robert H. Parrish, United States of America v. Wyatt J. Roy, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1967
- Sherrie Bursey and Brenda Joyce Presley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- United States v. Daniel Nelson SilvaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
- In the Matter of Disclosure of Testimony Before the Grand Jury. Appeal of Anthony S. TroiaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978
- United States v. Orville S. ClaveyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
- United States v. Eric WaltonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1979
- In Re SEALED MOTIONCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.