Legal Opinion

Rathbun v. Security Manufacturing Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 9, 1927No. Docket No. 4838PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McLUCAS, J.,

pro tern. — Action is brought to recover $34,800 as damages for nondelivery of certain motor valves which it is alleged defendant contracted to manufacture and deliver to plaintiffs and which plaintiffs had in turn contracted to sell and deliver to their customers. Defendant alleges that it did manufacture all of said valves that had been ordered, and offered to deliver the same, and that plaintiffs failed and refused to pay a promissory note of $300 given under the terms of the contract; and asks judgment for said amount, with attorney’s fees, together with judgment in the sum of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Rottman v. HevenerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  2. Henehan v. HartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Harloe v. LambieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Lindemann v. CoryellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
  5. Wood, Curtis & Co. v. SeurichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Pry Corp. of America v. LeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  2. Klein Norton Co. v. CohenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  3. Kulawitz v. Pacific Woodenware & Paper Co.California Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Middlecamp v. ZumwaltCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  5. Lewis Publishing Co. v. HendersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API