Legal Opinion

Falk v. State Bar of Mich.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 29, 1981No. 60722, (Calendar No. 5)PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Per curiam

This matter comes before this Court pursuant to plaintiffs "Petition for Special Relief’. In his petition the plaintiff sets forth his objections to a number of State Bar activities and asks that the petition "be granted”.

Based on the record we have before us, three members of the Court are of the view that the plaintiff is entitled to partial relief and would order it to be afforded. Several issues, however, cannot be decided without further development.

Two members of the Court are of the opinion that the plaintiff is not entitled to relief and would deny the petition.

Two members of the…

2Cases cited74 opinions

  1. Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Elrod v. BurnsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  5. United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Aft Michigan v. State of MichiganMichigan Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Mudge v. MacOmb CountyMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Tobin v. Civil Service CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Keller v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Kidder v. PtacinMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API