Legal Opinion

State v. Farley

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 9, 1988No. 87-7105, 87-03-103; CA A45512PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*725ROSSMAN, J.

In this prosecution for driving while suspended, ORS 811.175, and driving without insurance, ORS 806.010, the state appeals from the trial court’s order suppressing evidence obtained after a stop of defendant’s vehicle. We reverse.

Defendant was stopped because his vehicle had no visible license plates, an apparent traffic infraction. ORS 803.540. While talking with defendant, the officer saw a valid temporary vehicle permit posted on defendant’s windshield; that permit allowed defendant to operate the car without license plates. ORS 803.540(2)(a). The officer explained the reason…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. FloresCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  2. State v. PainterOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Sager v. McClendenOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  4. State v. MesserCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  5. State v. AuerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Pierce v. Multnomah CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  2. 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1006, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 1678 Stephanie G. Pierce v. Multnomah County, Oregon City of Portland, Oregon Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District of Oregon Steve Duncan Janet Bowdle And, George KarcherCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  3. State v. FarleyOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  4. State v. FarleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API