State v. Farley
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
*725ROSSMAN, J.
In this prosecution for driving while suspended, ORS 811.175, and driving without insurance, ORS 806.010, the state appeals from the trial court’s order suppressing evidence obtained after a stop of defendant’s vehicle. We reverse.
Defendant was stopped because his vehicle had no visible license plates, an apparent traffic infraction. ORS 803.540. While talking with defendant, the officer saw a valid temporary vehicle permit posted on defendant’s windshield; that permit allowed defendant to operate the car without license plates. ORS 803.540(2)(a). The officer explained the reason…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- State v. FloresCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
- State v. PainterOregon Supreme Court · 1984
- Sager v. McClendenOregon Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. MesserCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
- State v. AuerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Pierce v. Multnomah CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1006, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 1678 Stephanie G. Pierce v. Multnomah County, Oregon City of Portland, Oregon Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District of Oregon Steve Duncan Janet Bowdle And, George KarcherCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- State v. FarleyOregon Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. FarleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988