Legal Opinion

McDonnell Douglas Finance Corp. v. Pennsylvania Power & Light Co.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided September 16, 1988No. Nos. 366, 369 and 370, Dockets 87-7606, 87-7608 and 87-7610PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MESKILL, Circuit Judge:

In this appeal, we must construe a narrow and specific arbitration clause in a contract to determine whether the parties intended it to reach a particular dispute that has arisen out of an agreement governing the purchase of shares of preferred stock. The case is a consolidation of three separate lawsuits filed against defendant-appellant Pennsylvania Power & Light Co. (PP & L), a public utility that raises capital in part through the issuance of preferred shares. In 1986, PP & L sought to redeem, at par value, thousands of preferred shares issued in earlier years. In…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Concat Lp v. Unilever, PlcDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2004
  2. Milligan v. CCC Info. Servs. Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
  3. Com-Tech Associates v. Computer Associates International, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1990
  4. Porter & Clements, L.L.P. v. Stone, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1997
  5. Kowalewski v. SamandarovDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API