Legal Opinion

In Re Loring

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 19, 1973PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pbk Cukiam.

The Monmouth County Ethics Committee filed two presentments against respondent charging him with unethical conduct. We consider these separately, as the eases are completely unrelated.

I. The N. matter.

In relation to this matter the Committee found unethical conduct in three respects: (a) respondent charged Mr. N. an “exorbitant and unconscionable” fee for representing him in the successful defense of an indictment on a criminal charge; (b) he used economic coercion in exacting from N. and his wife a note and second mortgage on their home; and (c) there was a conflict of interest in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Rutherford Nat. Bank v. H.R. Bogle Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1933
  2. Temple v. Clinton Trust CompanySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1948
  3. In Re IntrocasoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
  4. In Re QuinnSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
  5. In Re KushinskySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1968

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Matter of SteinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  2. Matter of SchwartzSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
  3. In Re GrinchisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1978
  4. Matter of HumenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1991
  5. Petit-Clair v. NelsonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2001

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API