In Re Loring
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
Pbk Cukiam.
The Monmouth County Ethics Committee filed two presentments against respondent charging him with unethical conduct. We consider these separately, as the eases are completely unrelated.
I. The N. matter.
In relation to this matter the Committee found unethical conduct in three respects: (a) respondent charged Mr. N. an “exorbitant and unconscionable” fee for representing him in the successful defense of an indictment on a criminal charge; (b) he used economic coercion in exacting from N. and his wife a note and second mortgage on their home; and (c) there was a conflict of interest in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Rutherford Nat. Bank v. H.R. Bogle Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1933
- Temple v. Clinton Trust CompanySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1948
- In Re IntrocasoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
- In Re QuinnSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
- In Re KushinskySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1968
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Matter of SteinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
- Matter of SchwartzSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
- In Re GrinchisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1978
- Matter of HumenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1991
- Petit-Clair v. NelsonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2001
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.