Legal Opinion

In Re Quinn

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 12, 1957PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Weintraub, C. J.

This is a disciplinary matter arising out of a complaint made by respondent’s client, Sawa Zaboronak. It is charged that (1) respondent, despite an agreement to accept a fee of $1,000, demanded and received the further sum of $4,000 by threats, and (2) the amount received was “unreasonable and grossly excessive.”

On December 20, 1951 Zaboronak conveyed premises known as 14 Cornell Avenue, Hamilton Township, to his son and daughter-in-law, on the strength, as Zaboronak claimed, of an oral promise that he could live there with them for the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Herrscher v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  2. In re Removal of CarySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  3. Goldstone v. the State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  4. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of RichardsOregon Supreme Court · 1954
  5. People ex rel. Chicago Bar Ass'n v. PioIllinois Supreme Court · 1923

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. People v. RadinskySupreme Court of Colorado · 1973
  2. In Re LoringSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
  3. Township of Edison v. MezzaccaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
  4. Nazzaro v. WeinerDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1965
  5. Dunn v. Fred A. Mikkelson, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1979

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API