Legal Opinion

In Re Introcaso

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 31, 1958PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Ekancis, J.

The respondent Nicholas D. Introcaso, Jr., is a member of the bar of this State and practices law in Jersey City, New Jersey. The Ethics and Grievance Committee of Bergen County, after a number of hearings, found him guilty of violating Canons 21, 28, 34 and 22 of the Canons of Professional Ethics and presented the matter to this court for disciplinary action.

These canons declare that it is unprofessional for a lawyer to solicit employment through “touters” (Canon 21); that it is “disreputable” to “employ agents or runners” to bring or to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In Re FrankelSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1956

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Matter of HollendonnerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
  2. Tormo v. YormarkDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1975
  3. In Re AddonizioSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  4. In Re RandolphSupreme Court of Missouri · 1961
  5. In Re GalloSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2003

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API