Legal Opinion

Estate of Creek v. Mittal Steel USA, Inc.

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided April 14, 2008No. Civil Action 06-701Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

NORA BARRY FISCHER, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Pending before the Court is Defendants’ Mittal Steel US, Inc. (“Mittal”), International Steel Group (“ISG”), and Pristine Resources’ (collectively, “Defendants”) Motion for Summary Judgment [64]. For the following reasons, said motion is DENIED.

II. FACTUAL BACKGROUND

Plaintiffs Decedents David Creek and Lori Creek drowned in Pigeon Creek located on Defendants’ abandoned mine (hereinafter “Mine 51”) in Bentleyville and Ellsworth Boroughs in Washington County, Pennsylvania on May 8, 2005. (Docket No. 66 at ¶ 1, 2) (hereinafter…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Williams v. Borough of West ChesterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
  4. Marie Saldana v. Kmart Corporation Marie Saldana, in No. 99-4055Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
  5. Richard Conoshenti v. Public Service Electric & Gas CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API