Estate of Creek v. Mittal Steel USA, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
NORA BARRY FISCHER, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Pending before the Court is Defendants’ Mittal Steel US, Inc. (“Mittal”), International Steel Group (“ISG”), and Pristine Resources’ (collectively, “Defendants”) Motion for Summary Judgment [64]. For the following reasons, said motion is DENIED.
II. FACTUAL BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs Decedents David Creek and Lori Creek drowned in Pigeon Creek located on Defendants’ abandoned mine (hereinafter “Mine 51”) in Bentleyville and Ellsworth Boroughs in Washington County, Pennsylvania on May 8, 2005. (Docket No. 66 at ¶ 1, 2) (hereinafter…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Williams v. Borough of West ChesterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- Marie Saldana v. Kmart Corporation Marie Saldana, in No. 99-4055Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- Richard Conoshenti v. Public Service Electric & Gas CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.