Legal Opinion

Pieper v. Pieper

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 31, 1988No. 8726DC1110PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELLS, Judge.

The question is whether petitioner may use URESA as a vehicle to enforce in our State a foreign support decree which could not have been rendered under North Carolina law. The district court made, inter alia, the following findings of fact:

1. Mr. Pieper has been a resident of North Carolina since 1975.

2. Mr. and Mrs. Pieper entered no agreement for the payment of support for their son beyond the age of eighteen years.

3. N.C. Gen. Stat. § 52A-8 provides in part as follows: “Duties of support applicable under this Chapter are those imposed or imposable under the laws of any state…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sistare v. SistareSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  2. Fleming v. FlemingCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  3. Bridges v. BridgesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  4. Shaw v. ShawCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cavallari v. MartinSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
  2. State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  3. Cavallari v. MartinSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API