Legal Opinion

Shaw v. Shaw

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 5, 1975No. 7426DC999PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

CLARK, Judge.

Defendant filed a written motion to dismiss in which he stated that it was made pursuant to Rule 12. He did not specify which portion of the rule he feels is the applicable one but asks that the “complaint be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction”. If this were properly a question of jurisdiction, defendant’s appeal would be properly before us. Since it is not properly a question of jurisdiction, the appeal is not properly before us. We have, however, elected to treat the motion as one under Rule 12(b) (6) —a motion to dismiss for failure of plaintiff to state a claim upon which…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Shoaf v. ShoafSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Pieper v. PieperCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API