Legal Opinion

Sandoval v. The Center for Innovative Gyn Care, PC

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided May 10, 2022No. 8:17-cv-01599Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND SARAH SANDOVAL * * Plaintiff, * * v. * Civil No. PJM 17-cv-1599 * NATALYA DANILYANTS, M.D., et al., * * Defendants. * MEMORANDUM OPINION Sarah Sandoval sued Natalya Danilyants, M.D. and Danilyants’ employer The Center for Innovative Gyn Care, PC (CIGC) for medical malpractice arising from myomectomy surgery performed by Danilyants in 2015. Following the surgery, Sandoval was found to have two perforations of the bowel, which required additional corrective surgeries. The case went to trial beginning July 13, 2021. Sandoval’s…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Lockshin v. SemskerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  3. Duke v. Uniroyal Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
  4. Anderson v. RussellCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2001
  5. Belk, Incorporated v. Meyer Corporation, U.S.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API