Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Borgfeld

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided January 9, 1947No. Docket 144/608PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The object of the prosecution of this cause is to foreclose a tax sale certificate. The intervening matter in hand is the application of one Anna E. Carey to be admitted to the suit as a party defendant. She alleges in her petition that since 1940 she has been in actual possession of the premises to which the certificate relates and hence has an interest which a decree in the cause will affect. Chancery rule 13.

The indubitable purpose of the petitioner is to endeavor to accomplish a redemption of the premises by tendering to the complainant the amount due on the certificate in exchange for…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Smith v. SpechtNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1899
  2. Alt v. KwiatekNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1941
  3. Bucci v. PopovichNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1921
  4. Bucci v. PopovichSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1922
  5. Downs v. Jersey Central Power, C., Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1934

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. BessonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1970
  2. Lipman v. ShriverNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
  3. Northfield City v. ZellNew Jersey Tax Court · 1991
  4. Jefferson v. DavisNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
  5. Diamonde v. Berkeley TownshipNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1948

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API