Legal Opinion

Kemble v. Wiltison

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided October 17, 1922PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ritz, Judge:

This is a suit to recover the amount of a negotiable promissory note given by the defendants to the plaintiff for the purchase price of a second-hand automobile. On the trial of the case in the circuit ■ court the defendant’s defense 'was held to be insufficient and a verdict directed for the plaintiff for the amount of said note with interest.

Upon the trial the plaintiff introduced the note in suit and testified that it had not been paid. The defendant Wil-tison then, in support of the plea of non assumpsit, showed that the note had been given as the price of a second-hand…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gilmer v. SydenstrickerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Star Piano Co. v. BurgnerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Teter v. GeorgeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Eagle Glass & Manufacturing Co. v. Second Hand Pipe & Supply Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Ohio River Contract Co. v. SmithWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Chemical Tank Lines, Inc. v. DavisWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Sylvia Coal Co. v. Mercury Coal & Coke Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Frick Co. v. LawsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
  4. Shreve v. Casto Trailer Sales, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Dixie Appliance Co. v. BourneWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1953

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API