Legal Opinion

Ohio River Contract Co. v. Smith

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided June 8, 1915PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to Circuit Court, Wood County. Action by the Ohio River Contract Company against Lloyd E. Smith. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Poffenrarger, Judge:

Rulings upon instructions and evidence, the correctness of which depends largely upon principles of the law of sales, are the major subjects of complaint on this writ of error to a judgment for $669.38, in an action of debt for the alleged contract price of certain steel sheet piling, defense to which was made under the general issue and a special plea of set-off for freight on the piling, paid by the defendant.

The contract out of which the controversy arose was a verbal one and is to be deduced from the highly conflicting testimony of three witnesses for the plaintiff,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sterling Organ Co. v. HouseWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Manss-Bruning Shoe Co. v. PrinceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Eagle Glass & Manufacturing Co. v. Second Hand Pipe & Supply Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Wiley v. MartinWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1913

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Regent Waist Co. v. O. J. Morrison Department Store Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Kemble v. WiltisonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1922
  3. American Sugar Refining Co. v. Martin-Nelly Grocery Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Shreve v. Casto Trailer Sales, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Dixie Appliance Co. v. BourneWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1953

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API