Legal Opinion
People v. Cooper
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided September 11, 2000No. 98CA1614PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge MARQUEZ.
Defendant, David Cooper, appeals from the trial court's order denying his Crim. P. 35(c) motion. We reverse and remand for further proceedings.
Defendant pled guilty to second degree sexual assault based on events that occurred on July 28, 1996. Subsequently, defendant moved for relief under Crim. P. 85(c), contending, as relevant here, that the Department of Corrections (DOC) had added a five-year period of mandatory parole in violation of Colorado law. With regard to this claim, the court summarily denied the motion and concluded that a period of mandatory parole was…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Craig v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999
- Nardell U. Carter v. Daniel McCarthy Midge Carroll, John K. Van De KampCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- People v. SwainSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998
- People v. MooreColorado Court of Appeals · 1992
- Freeman v. Rost Family TrustColorado Court of Appeals · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. CooperSupreme Court of Colorado · 2001
- Usick v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2006
- People v. CooperSupreme Court of Colorado · 2001