Legal Opinion

Usick v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided January 26, 2006No. 04CA1943PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIDSON, Chief Judge.

In this health insurance coverage action concerning exclusions for preexisting conditions in individual health insurance policies, plaintiff, Cindy M. Usick, appeals from the trial court’s summary judgment in favor of defendant, American Family Mutual Insurance Company. We affirm.

In March 1995, Usick purchased an individual health insurance policy issued by American Family. During the application process, Usick disclosed that she had a history of endometriosis. The form policy subsequently issued to Usick contained a general provision providing coverage for preexisting…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. People v. CooperSupreme Court of Colorado · 2001
  2. Public Service Co. of Colorado v. Wallis & CompaniesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999
  3. Peterman v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1998
  4. Cary v. United of Omaha Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2005
  5. Carlson v. FerrisSupreme Court of Colorado · 2003

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kenseth v. DEAN HEALTH PLAN, INC.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
  2. Colorado Consumer Health Initiative v. Colorado Board of HealthColorado Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. American Automobile Insurance v. MarlowDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2009
  4. Colorado Consumer Health Initiative v. Colorado Board of HealthColorado Court of Appeals · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API