Legal Opinion

People v. Cooper

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided June 25, 2001No. 00SC474, 00SC499, 00SC587 and 00SC588PublishedCited by 84 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Martinez

These four cases, which we have consolidated here, present a question of the extension of the issue we resolved in Martin v. People, 27 P.3d 846 (2001). We granted certiorari in all four of these cases to determine whether the court of appeals correctly concluded that the statutory scheme and legislative intent require that parole for sex offenders convicted of offenses committed between July 1, 1996, and November 1, 1998, is discretionary under the provisions in sections 17-2-201(5)(@a.5) and 18-1-105(1)(a)(Vv)(C).1 Our inquiry focuses on two distinct statutory schemes of parole, and…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Clifford F. MacEvoy Co. v. United States Ex Rel. Calvin Tomkins Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. D. Ginsberg & Sons, Inc. v. PopkinSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Martin v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2001
  4. Schubert v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
  5. Craig v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by84 opinions

  1. Frazier v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2004
  2. Woellhaf v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
  3. People v. YascavageSupreme Court of Colorado · 2004
  4. People v. RockwellSupreme Court of Colorado · 2006
  5. Delgado v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005

79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API