Legal Opinion

People v. Moore

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided September 10, 1992No. 91CA1921PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge PIERCE.

Defendant, Carl E. Moore, appeals an order of the trial court denying his motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm in part and remand.

Defendant entered a plea of guilty to first degree sexual assault and received a stipulated 16-year sentence. Upon learning that he would not be subject to mandatory parole, defendant filed a motion for post-conviction relief alleging that the plea had not been entered knowingly and that he had received ineffective assistance of counsel.

At a hearing on the motion, defendant’s counsel testified that she had advised defendant that he…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Thiret v. KautzkySupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
  3. People v. GarciaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  4. William Lloyd Hill v. A.L. Lockhart, Director, Arkansas Department of CorrectionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
  5. Aue v. DiesslinSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Williams v. DuffySupreme Court of Georgia · 1999
  2. v. Chalchi-SevillaColorado Court of Appeals · 2019
  3. People v. CooperColorado Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. People v. LustgardenColorado Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. People v. WilburColorado Court of Appeals · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API