Legal Opinion

Holliday v. Erwin

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 1, 1935No. 9624PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This suit was instituted by defendant in error, A. C. Erwin, to cancel a release or receipt for the sum of $10,000, alleged to have been executed by him as a result of duress and fraud. He also sought a decree declaring him to be the owner of one-fourth of seven-eighths of the first oil produced from a well upon a certain 50 acres of land located in Nueces county, Tex., or from any other well, or wells, that might be drilled upon said 50 acres of land, until the full sum of $16,250 had been paid to him. Plaintiffs in error are A. F. Holliday, Bendum Trees, Inc., and J. C. Trees. They are all…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sheffield v. HoggTexas Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Mason v. PetersonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1923
  3. Collins v. ChipmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1906
  4. American Soda Fountain Co. v. Hairston Drug Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  5. Wilson v. National BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1901

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Arthur C. Roumel v. Drill Well Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
  2. Erwin v. HollidayTexas Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Phillips Petroleum Co. v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941
  4. Alfrey v. EllingtonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955
  5. Local Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. EckroatSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API