Legal Opinion

Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Taylor

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided January 14, 1941No. 9421PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLMES, Circuit Judge.

On petition for rehearing, we have before us a question of law which was 'not fully presented or dealt with on the first appeal of the case. It is whether or not the appellee Gray, as assignor of the mineral lease, under the facts of the case, had an enforceable covenant, either express or implied, to be protected from drainage by his assignee.

In the opinion, 1 we held that the Texas law gave Gray, by implication, an enforceable covenant, and the case of Freeport Sulphur Co. v. American Sulphur Royalty Company, 2 was cited in support of that position. While that case…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Brewster v. Lanyon Zinc Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905
  2. Freeport Sulphur Co. v. American Sulphur Royalty Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Grubb v. McAfeeTexas Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Colquitt v. Eureka Producing Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1933
  5. J. M. Guffey Petroleum Co. v. Jeff Chaison Townsite Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1908

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. United States v. John H. FewellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
  2. Eog Resources, Inc. v. Hanson Production Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2002
  3. Darr v. EldridgeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Tidelands Royalty "B" Corp. v. Gulf Oil CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
  5. Hagood v. HeckersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1973

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API