Legal Opinion

United States v. Montcalm

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided March 17, 1976No. CM 431335PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF ERROR CORAM NOBIS

OPINION OF THE COURT

DeFORD, Judge:

The petitioner through counsel seeks to invoke the power of this Court by having filed a Petition for Extraordinary Relief in the Nature of a Petition for Writ of Error Coram Nobis. The operative facts upon which the petitioner seeks relief are as follows: At a trial by general court-martial on 8 March 1974 petitioner was convicted upon his plea pursuant to a pretrial agreement of multiple offenses of burglary, larceny and a single specification of possession of marijuana. He received an approved sentence of a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Schlesinger v. CouncilmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. United States v. FrischholzUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1966
  3. United States v. HollandUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
  4. United States v. SchmeltzUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
  5. Kelly v. United StatesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dew v. United StatesArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 1998
  2. United States v. ParkerU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1979
  3. Littleton v. PersonsU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1979
  4. Dew v. United StatesArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API