United States v. Montcalm
U.S. Army Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF ERROR CORAM NOBIS
OPINION OF THE COURT
DeFORD, Judge:
The petitioner through counsel seeks to invoke the power of this Court by having filed a Petition for Extraordinary Relief in the Nature of a Petition for Writ of Error Coram Nobis. The operative facts upon which the petitioner seeks relief are as follows: At a trial by general court-martial on 8 March 1974 petitioner was convicted upon his plea pursuant to a pretrial agreement of multiple offenses of burglary, larceny and a single specification of possession of marijuana. He received an approved sentence of a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Schlesinger v. CouncilmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. FrischholzUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1966
- United States v. HollandUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
- United States v. SchmeltzUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
- Kelly v. United StatesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Dew v. United StatesArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 1998
- United States v. ParkerU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1979
- Littleton v. PersonsU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1979
- Dew v. United StatesArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 1998