Legal Opinion

United States v. Schmeltz

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided April 11, 1975No. 29,110PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Ferguson, Senior Judge:

After pleading guilty to and being convicted of a number of drug offenses, the accused urges this Court to set aside the findings of guilty and direct a rehearing on the basis that certain provisions of his pretrial agreement were contrary to public policy. Our decision necessitates a review of the circumstances of the case.

Originally, the accused was charged with eight drug offenses. At an Article 39(a) session held on November 27, 1973, he was duly arraigned and moved to suppress a pretrial statement in which he had confessed his guilt. After…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. CummingsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1968
  2. United States v. ScolesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1963
  3. United States v. TroglinUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1972
  4. United States v. DarringUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. United States v. DawsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1981
  2. United States v. SchafferUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  3. United States v. ZelenskiUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
  4. United States v. JohnsonU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1976
  5. United States v. CassityU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1992

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API