Gorman v. City of Woodinville
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJ.M. Johnson, J.
¶1 Washington law is clear that “title by adverse possession cannot be acquired against the state.” Commercial Waterway Dist. No. 1 of King County v. Permanente Cement Co., 61 Wn.2d 509, 512, 379 P.2d 178 (1963). One reason is the statute of limitations for establishing a claim of title through adverse possession cannot run against the government. RCW 4.16.160 provides, “[N]o claim of right predicated upon the lapse of time shall ever be asserted against the state.” We are asked whether RCW 4.16.160 bars a quiet title action where the claimant alleges he adversely possessed property belonging…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Reid v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Reid v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- United States v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Chaplin v. SandersWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- Bellevue Sch. Dist. v. BRAZIER CONSTR.Washington Supreme Court · 1984
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Trujillo v. Northwest Trustee Services, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2015
- Roy v. Woodstock Community Trust, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2014
- Darlington Ofuasia Et Al., Appellants, v. Dana William Smurr Et Al., RespondentsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
- Carrera Ex Rel. Department of Labor & Industries v. OlmsteadCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
- Lundgren v. Upper Skagit Indian TribeWashington Supreme Court · 2017
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.