Legal Opinion

Starobin v. Niagara Machine & Tool Works Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 5, 1991PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Mercure, J.

Plaintiffs commenced this action to recover for injuries sustained in 1985 by plaintiff Israel Starobin in the course of his employment with third-party defendant, Lightron of Cornwall, Inc. (hereinafter Lightron), when a frame press accidentally cycled while Starobin was adjusting a die. It is undisputed that defendant Instrument Systems Corporation (hereinafter ISC), then the parent corporation of Lightron, purchased the frame press and placed it in service in 1969. In 1970, as part of a $4 million financing plan, ISC conveyed title to the press, together with…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Robinson v. Reed-Prentice Division of Package Machinery Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Nath v. National Equipment Leasing Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Winckel v. Atlantic Rentals & Sales, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  4. Brumbaugh v. CEJJ, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  5. Brescia v. Great Road Realty TrustSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Gonzalez v. Rutherford Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1995
  2. Arriaga v. CitiCapital Commercial Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2008
  3. Long v. Tokai Bank of CaliforniaOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. Motelson v. Ford Motor Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  5. HOUSTON, LUZ M. v. MCNEILUS TRUCK AND MANUFACTURING, IAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API