Legal Opinion

Arriaga v. CitiCapital Commercial Corp.

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 3, 2008No. F052419PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

LEVY, Acting P. J.

Appellant, Guillermo Arriaga, was injured when his finger became entangled in a glue spreading machine. This machine was in used condition when purchased by Arriaga’s employer, Orepak Hardwood Products, Inc. (Orepak). The accident occurred because a guard was removed from the glue spreader before Orepak took possession.

Respondent, CitiCapital Commercial Corporation (CitiCapital), is the successor in interest to JLA Credit Corporation (JLA). JLA financed the purchase of the glue spreader through a finance lease for AVP, Ltd. (AVP). As a lessor under a finance lease,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Merrill v. Navegar, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Vandermark v. Ford Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Price v. Shell Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Balido v. Improved MacHinery, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1972

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Bigler-Engler v. Breg, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2017
  2. In re FCA US LLC Monostable Electronic Gearshift LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2017
  3. Malen v. MTD Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
  4. Maxton v. Western States MetalsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  5. Gaumer v. ROSSVILLE TRUCK AND TRACTOR CO.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2011

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API