Legal Opinion
Ceramic Corp. of America v. Inka Maritime Corp. Inc.
District Court, C.D. California
Decided July 12, 1995No. CV 91-3281-KN(RMCx)PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER RE MOTION TO QUASH SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM SERVED ON SEA RIVER MARITIME, INC.
CHAPMAN, United States Magistrate Judge.
On June 28, 1995, Captain Mitchell Stoller (hereinafter Stoller) filed a Notice of Motion and Motion to Quash the Subpoena Duces Tecum served on the Custodian of Records for Sea River Maritime, Inc., and for Protective Order; Supporting Memorandum of Points and Authorities, and declarations of Stoller and David A. St.Clair. On July 5, 1995, defendants filed a Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Opposition to Motion to Quash Subpoena Duces Tecum.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Kerr v. United States Dist. Court for Northern Dist. of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. ZolinSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Henry W. Kerr v. United States District Court for the Northern District of California, John Van Geldern, Real Parties in InterestCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Ramirez v. County of Los AngelesDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2005
- Scaife v. BoenneDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2000
- Leanders v. Yassai (In re Yassai)United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 1998
- (PC) Kidwell v. California Prison Industry AuthorityDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
- Dayal v. County of KernDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.