Legal Opinion

Dayal v. County of Kern

District Court, E.D. California

Decided June 11, 2025No. 1:24-cv-00039Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 NISHI DAYAL, Case No. 1:24-cv-00039-JLT-CDB 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART 13 v. DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO COMPEL 14 COUNTY OF KERN, et al., (Docs. 64, 65) 15 Defendants. 14-Day Deadline 16 17 Pending before the Court is the motion brought pursuant to Rule 37 of the Federal Rules 18 of Civil Procedure by Defendant County of Kern to compel Plaintiff Nishi Dayal to provide 19 “further responses” to three of Defendant Kern County District Attorney’s Office’s requests for 20 production of documents. (Docs 64,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Pioneer Electronics (USA), Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Giacchetto v. Patchogue-Medford Union Free School DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2013
  4. Ceramic Corp. of America v. Inka Maritime Corp. Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API