Legal Opinion

Ramirez v. County of Los Angeles

District Court, C.D. California

Decided August 15, 2005No. CV 04-6102GAF (FMOX)PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*409ORDER Re: DISCOVERY MOTION

OLGUIN, United States Magistrate Judge.

The court has reviewed and considered all the briefing filed with respect to plaintiff's Motion to Compel Production of Documents (“Motion”), and concludes that oral argument is not necessary to resolve this matter. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 78; Local Rule 7-15; Willis v. Pac. Mar. Ass’n, 244 F.3d 675, 684 n. 2 (9th Cir.2001).

INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff Raul Ramirez (“plaintiff' or “Ramirez”) was arrested by defendant Frank Bravo (“Bravo”) and prosecuted for kidnapping and attempted rape of a teenage girl. Plaintiff was acquitted and a finding…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Richard Davis v. Robert H. FendlerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  2. Richmark Corp. v. Timber Falling ConsultantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  3. Kelly v. City of San JoseDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1987
  4. Garrett v. City & County of San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  5. King v. CondeDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1988

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Cargill, Inc. v. Ron Burge Trucking, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2012
  2. Enron Corp. Savings Plan v. Hewitt Associates, L.L.C.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2009
  3. Ayers v. Continental Casualty Co.District Court, N.D. West Virginia · 2007
  4. Horace Mann Insurance v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2006
  5. Friends of Hope Valley v. Frederick Co.District Court, E.D. California · 2010

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API