State v. Davids
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the CourtLaROCQUE, J.
Bert Davids, an enrolled member of the Stockbridge-Munsee Indians, appeals a judgment of conviction for violation of § 29.09(1), STATS., fishing without a license. Davids argues that the State lacks jurisdiction to convict him of fishing without a license under § 29.09(1).1 Specifically, Davids claims that the 1856 Treaty between the Stock-bridge-Munsee and the United States created a reservation and gave tribal members the right to hunt and fish within the boundaries created by the Treaty. He asserts that Congress never diminished or disestablished the reservation boundaries, or terminated…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- DeCoteau v. District County Court for the Tenth Judicial DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Solem v. BartlettSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Mattz v. ArnettSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Seymour v. Superintendent of Washington State PenitentiarySupreme Court of the United States · 1962
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. DavidsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. DavidsCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1994
- State v. DavidsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995