Legal Opinion
Renz v. Allstate Insurance
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided January 9, 2001No. AC 20367PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PETERS, J.
The dispositive issue in this case is whether the legislature, in enacting what is now General Statutes § 38a-336 (d),1 which prohibits the stacking of automobile insurance coverages, intended to have the prohibition apply to insurance policies issued in the gap period between the enactment of the statute on July 1, 1993, and its effective date. The issue arises in the context of a claim for stacking coverages that was based on an accident that occurred after the effective date of the statute. Relying on the effective date provision in Public Acts 1993, No. 93-297 (P.A.…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- State v. TorresSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Bauer v. Waste Management of Connecticut, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Cotto v. United Technologies Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Pitchell v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Fishbein v. KozlowskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Renz v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Wasko v. ManellaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002